Josef – Coming to terms with the past

Date: 27 Sep­tem­ber 2020 | Pre­a­cher:
Series: | Bible text: Gene­sis 50:17–21
Hint: This ser­mon has been machi­ne trans­la­ted. Plea­se note that we can­not accept any respon­si­bi­li­ty for the accu­ra­cy of the content.

Being spoi­led by his father, rejec­tion and betra­y­al by his ven­geful brot­hers, all the inju­s­ti­ces in Egypt – Joseph seems pre­desti­ned for a vic­tim role. How can someone cope with such a past? The key was the ren­un­cia­ti­on of taking on God’s role, the trust in God’s good­ness and the desi­re to live his life for God’s glory.


Our pri­sons are full of peo­p­le who, on clo­ser inspec­tion, expe­ri­en­ced a bad child­hood with sad expe­ri­en­ces. A father who repea­ted­ly acted out or was absent, a mother who acted over­whel­med or over­pro­tec­ti­ve, a tea­cher who made them a slug, unwan­ted child. How can such a past be over­co­me? Joseph also had a few deep impacts in his biography:

  • Joseph grew up as the favou­red and spoilt child of his father Jacob, who loved him more than all his other children.
  • God gave him two dreams that made the situa­ti­on worse and dro­ve his brot­hers to fury against him.
  • The brot­hers plan­ned Joseph’s mur­der, but then sold him as a slave to Egypt.
  • Joseph was inno­cent­ly thrown into pri­son, even though he had pro­ven hims­elf to be a God-fea­ring man.
  • He was for­got­ten by the cup­bea­rer, whom he had pre­dic­ted would be reinstated.

The father’s pam­pe­ring, the rejec­tion and betra­y­al of the ven­geful brot­hers, all the inju­s­ti­ces in Egypt – Joseph seems pre­desti­ned for a vic­tim role. How can someone cope with such a past? Appar­ent­ly Joseph suc­cee­ded in this, for he said more than for­ty years after he was sold as a slave by his brot­hers, to his brot­hers who had just asked him for forgiveness:

«Do not be afraid of me. Am I in God’s place? As far as I am con­cer­ned, God has tur­ned ever­y­thing evil that you have plan­ned to good. In this way, he wan­ted to save the lives of many peo­p­le. So do not be afraid. I mys­elf will take care of you and your fami­lies.» So he reassu­red them and spo­ke kind­ly to them» (Gene­sis 50:19–21 NL). Why was Joseph able to over­co­me his past despi­te his ter­ri­ble expe­ri­en­ces and, as a result, live a life of free­dom and reconciliation?

The term «coming to terms with the past» was coin­ed after the Second World War. It was about the ques­ti­on of how the Ger­man peo­p­le could deal with the guilt, the bur­den and the oppres­si­ve fee­lings of the past, the inju­ries and the vic­tims of the Holo­caust. We under­stand this to mean that someone comes to terms with his or her pain­ful past by the per­son expe­ri­en­cing heal­ing of the inju­ries suf­fe­r­ed. In most cases, a pas­to­ral coun­sell­or helps in this pro­cess. Every per­son – regard­less of their histo­ry – should one day come to terms with their past.

Renouncing the role of God

When their father Jacob died, Joseph’s brot­hers beca­me afraid. They feared that Joseph would now take reven­ge. So they cau­tious­ly plea­ded with Joseph: «That is why we ask you to for­gi­ve us. We ser­ve the same God as our Father» (Gene­sis 50:17b NL).

How would you have reac­ted? This was a uni­que oppor­tu­ni­ty to exer­cise power over the brot­hers from a posi­ti­on of pres­ti­ge. The tempt­a­ti­on is huge to keep the brot­hers in debt. You then have con­trol over them and can let them stew a bit. «To for­gi­ve is to release a pri­soner and to reco­g­ni­se that this pri­soner was you.»(Lewis Sme­des). Joseph did not give in to tempt­a­ti­on. On the con­tra­ry, he reve­a­led his soft, mal­leable heart: «[…] When Joseph recei­ved the news, he had to cry» (Gene­sis 50:17c NL).

Joseph did not want to have the upper hand, but went on to say: «Am I in God’s place?» Behind this ques­ti­on is a hum­ble heart that sub­mits to the hand of God. He had told his brot­hers befo­re: «God sent me here befo­re you so that He might mira­cu­lous­ly keep you ali­ve and some of you might remain. Yes, it was not you who sent me here, but God! And he has made me Pharaoh’s chief advi­ser – lord over his who­le house and ruler over all Egypt»(Gene­sis 45:7–8 NL). Joseph trusts in a God who pulls all the strings tog­e­ther. He does not see hims­elf as a vic­tim of his cir­cum­s­tances, his over­ly loving father or his jea­lous brot­hers, nor as a vic­tim of a tyran­ni­cal God who arbi­tra­ri­ly rules over his life or as a vic­tim of a power­less God who is inca­pa­ble of making Joseph’s life more just, plea­sant and wit­hout suf­fe­ring. Such a vic­tim atti­tu­de and bathing in the sea of self-pity is ali­en to Joseph.

A past that is unjust and pain­ful in our eyes easi­ly leads us into the tempt­a­ti­on of self-pity. This atti­tu­de has serious con­se­quen­ces, for it oppo­ses the Gos­pel at its deepest core for two reasons, name­ly for­gi­ve­ness and reconciliation:

  1. A vic­tim men­ta­li­ty sees the bla­me only on the next per­son and the­r­e­fo­re needs no for­gi­ve­ness its­elf. That is why such a heart remains ent­an­gled in its own guilt.
  2. A sacri­fi­ci­al atti­tu­de comes from the pri­de of the heart and does not want to pass on for­gi­ve­nessbecau­se then the role of the vic­tim would be inva­lid. But this makes recon­ci­lia­ti­on impossible.

Fol­lo­wers of Jesus who remain in the atti­tu­de of sacri­fice do not need Christ, becau­se they do not see them­sel­ves as peo­p­le in need of sal­va­ti­on. Only hum­ble peo­p­le ack­now­ledge that they need a Saviour. All human beings, no mat­ter how many times one has «fal­len short» in one’s life, is also a per­pe­tra­tor. Joseph’s beha­viour as a 17 year old ’snob» was out of line, pri­deful and nar­cis­si­stic. No one is just a vic­tim. Ever­yo­ne is also guil­ty befo­re God and other peo­p­le and is the­r­e­fo­re also depen­dent on for­gi­ve­ness. Coming to terms with the past is always about both – recei­ving for­gi­ve­ness and gran­ting forgiveness.

Abra­ham Lin­coln, US Pre­si­dent from 1861–1865, was at a public event and had just had a lon­ger con­ver­sa­ti­on with a man. The con­ver­sa­ti­on ended and the Pre­si­dent depar­ted. On his way out, he spo­ke to one of his advi­sers about the pre­vious encoun­ter. «I don’t like his face», Lin­coln said. «But a per­son can’t help what kind of face they have», the coun­sell­or defends the man. «But», Lin­coln repli­ed, «ever­yo­ne is respon­si­ble for their face once they have pas­sed for­ty.«Lin­coln did not mean to say that we can influence what colour our eyes are or how much hair we have. But what expres­si­on is on our face is up to us. In fact, our facial expres­si­on is an expres­si­on of our inner self, a kind of mir­ror of our soul. We are not respon­si­ble for what hap­pen­ed to us in life. But we are respon­si­ble for how we deal with it as adults, whe­ther we stay with the old, let it deter­mi­ne and para­ly­se us – or per­sis­t­ent­ly seek God’s bles­sing. No mat­ter what life wound you bring, God wants to give you more abun­dance, bless you more and use you more.

«Am I in God’s place?«The­re are pas­tors who advi­se peo­p­le to real­ly accu­se God once and throw anger and pain at him. God will bear it. In his book «God in the dock», C.S. Lewis wri­tes the fol­lo­wing lines: «God is in the dock.Anci­ent man approa­ched God in the atti­tu­de of the accu­sed who comes befo­re his judge. For modern man, the­se roles are rever­sed. He is the judge – God sits in the dock. Cer­tain­ly, he is a bene­vo­lent judge. If God should have a reasonable defence for being the God who allows wars, pover­ty and pesti­lence – then man is rea­dy to hear him. The tri­al could even end with God’s acquit­tal. But the bot­tom line is: man sits in the judge’s chair and God in the dock.» The­re is no God who lea­ves us sit­ting on the jud­ge­ment seat and sits in the dock. A hum­ble heart will com­plain befo­re God, the Judge, but never rise up on the judgment seat and accuse.

Trust in God’s goodness

«As far as I am con­cer­ned, God has tur­ned all the evil you plan­ned to do to good»(Gene­sis 50:20a NL). Two things are abso­lut­e­ly neces­sa­ry for coming to terms with the past: First, Joseph does not tri­via­li­se the evil he had to expe­ri­ence at the hands of his brot­hers. He addres­ses it open­ly and direct­ly. Second­ly, it holds the rea­li­sa­ti­on that God works all things for our good.

In reapp­rai­sal pro­ces­ses, I repea­ted­ly see young peo­p­le coming to the defence of their par­ents and say­ing: «They hurt me deep­ly, but they were also vic­tims of their cir­cum­s­tances and actual­ly meant well.» This is nice and con­side­ra­te, but does not lead to heal­ing and recon­ci­lia­ti­on. The cau­ses of the hurts must be spo­ken out so that someone can con­cre­te­ly for­gi­ve and bring the guilt to the cross.

The sto­ry of Joseph illus­tra­tes an important truth: God does well! He had a good inten­ti­on with ever­yo­ne: the brot­hers, the father and also with Joseph. God used their vile deeds to save his peo­p­le. Dung beco­mes fer­ti­li­ser. God has the uni­que abili­ty to crea­te a beau­tiful world out of cha­os. Joseph could have hurt other peo­p­le in turn becau­se of the inju­ries he suf­fe­r­ed. This is the nor­mal cycle that is con­stant­ly repea­ted in our world. This «vicious cir­cle» can only be bro­ken if we hold on to God’s good­ness and faithful­ness. Joseph held fast to the fact that all things are for the best to tho­se who love God (Romans 8:28–29) – even in the midst of inju­s­ti­ce. The­re is much inju­s­ti­ce on this earth. We seek jus­ti­ce. Whe­re do we find it? Here is the ans­wer: «For he made him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that in him we might beco­me righ­teous­ness in the sight of God.»(2 Corin­thi­ans 5:21 Lut). Jesus is righ­teous­ness, he bestows it upon us so that we may call it our own. We only find jus­ti­ce with Jesus!

Living for God’s Glory

«In this way he wan­ted to save the lives of many peo­p­le» (Gene­sis 50:20b NL). Joseph loo­ked behind the sce­ne and dis­co­ver­ed the big sto­ry. Through the hea­vy lot that met him, some­thing gre­at hap­pen­ed: a gre­at peo­p­le was kept ali­ve. This hono­u­red God. Joseph accept­ed God’s sove­reign gui­dance in his life. Jus­ti­ce and the glo­ry of God were more important to him than the ful­film­ent of his desi­res and lusts. Joseph was allo­wed to be an important pie­ce of the puz­zle in God’s gre­at work of redemp­ti­on. We will never be this in the same sen­se as Joseph. By recor­ding the sove­reign gui­dance of our Saviour and the good­ness of God in our lives, we reflect the glo­ry of God in a righ­teous way and ther­eby increase His honour, glo­ry and prai­se in this world. For deal­ing with the past, it is of gre­at importance that we seek God’s glo­ry. Through this focus we increase His honour, glo­ry and prai­se in this world. We beco­me a bles­sing for tho­se around us.

 

The linch­pin of all coming to terms with the past is for­gi­ve­ness. I need for­gi­ve­ness from God and peo­p­le for my guil­ty beha­viour. I grant for­gi­ve­ness to other peo­p­le becau­se God has for­gi­ven me the much grea­ter debt. For­gi­ve­ness does not mean for­get­ting, but «I will remem­ber their mis­deeds no more»(Hebrews 10:17 Lut). For­gi­ve­ness is the ren­un­cia­ti­on of con­ti­nuing to suf­fer from what I have suf­fe­r­ed, to be limi­t­ed and to be a guar­di­an befo­re the pri­son of my offen­ders. It is a decis­i­on of the will that sets in moti­on a pro­cess of recon­ci­lia­ti­on. The result is free­dom for all. Peo­p­le who have over­co­me their past beco­me a bles­sing, salt and light, for tho­se around them. It is no coin­ci­dence that Joseph’s recon­ci­lia­ti­on pro­cess ran par­al­lel to the bles­sing of the sons of Jacob and the sons of Joseph. (Gene­sis 49).

 

 

 

Possible questions for the small groups

Rea­ding the Bible text: Gene­sis 50:17–21

  1. What thoughts might have gone through Joseph’s mind when his brot­hers were ser­ved to him on a platter?
  2. What is the gain of someone living in the vic­tim mind­set? What is the down­si­de of it?
  3. Why is a sacri­fi­ci­al atti­tu­de dia­me­tri­cal­ly oppo­sed to the Gospel?
  4. To what ext­ent have you dealt with your past or do nega­ti­ve expe­ri­en­ces have an influence on your life?
  5. What does a for­gi­ve­ness pro­cess look like in con­cre­te terms?