Date: 30 Janu­ary 2022 | Pre­a­cher:
Series: | Bible text: Gene­sis 1:26–27
Hint: This ser­mon has been machi­ne trans­la­ted. Plea­se note that we can­not accept any respon­si­bi­li­ty for the accu­ra­cy of the content.

Man is crea­ted in the image of God. He reflects God. In this sta­tus lies a tre­men­dous respon­si­bi­li­ty, which is incum­bent on man. But the image that human beings pre­sent is crumbling and has migh­ty cracks. Man does not mana­ge to live up to his respon­si­bi­li­ty. But the­re is hope. In Jesus Christ we find the per­fect image of God – wit­hout scrat­ches. Fol­lo­wers of Jesus may share in the per­fect image of God through him. Through Jesus Christ they find their true desti­ny – to be God’s images.


In 2017, the Swiss Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on did a sur­vey. The ques­ti­on was how many peo­p­le expe­ri­ence loneli­ne­ss in their lives. The figu­res that came out are stag­ge­ring. Of all the peo­p­le aged 15 and over who live in Switz­er­land, 38% feel lonely. This is an indi­vi­du­al fee­ling, but it is nevert­hel­ess a stag­ge­ring figu­re. More than a third of all peo­p­le in Switz­er­land feel lonely. Loneli­ne­ss is not wit­hout pro­blems and can mani­fest its­elf in various sym­ptoms. Typi­cal sym­ptoms are ten­si­on, ner­vous­ness, inse­cu­ri­ty, rest­less­ness, pal­pi­ta­ti­ons, anxie­ty, diz­ziness or sleep dis­or­ders. What is exci­ting here is the fact that older peo­p­le tend to feel less lonely. The per­cep­ti­on of loneli­ne­ss decrea­ses with age, but is still 32% among tho­se over 65. Peo­p­le need a coun­ter­part. Peo­p­le need a social net­work and con­nec­tions to other peo­p­le. Human beings are crea­ted for rela­ti­onship. Gene­sis 1:26–27 tells the sto­ry of how man was crea­ted. «Then God said, «We will make man in our image, like our­sel­ves. They shall have domi­ni­on over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, over all catt­le, over wild beasts, and over every cree­ping thing. Thus God crea­ted man in his own image, in the image of God he crea­ted them, male and fema­le he crea­ted them.» (Gene­sis 1:26–27, NLB).

1. man – image of God

Man is crea­ted in the image of God, as Ima­go Dei. Being in the image of God means that man has some­thing divi­ne about him. I am con­vin­ced that this is the most important reason why human beings long for a coun­ter­part. This is alre­a­dy evi­dent at the very begin­ning of God’s crea­ti­on of human beings. God crea­ted human beings as male and fema­le. Only in this pola­ri­ty is the human being an image of God. A man or a woman con­side­red by its­elf is imper­fect and only a part of the image of God. When God crea­ted the earth, the expres­si­on it was good or even it was very good appears again and again. But only at one point is the state­ment found that some­thing was not good with the crea­ti­on. «Then the Lord God said: «It is not good for man to be alo­ne. I will crea­te a being for him that will fit him». (Gene­sis 2:18 NLB). This refers to the absence of the fema­le part. The human being is only ful­ly for­med as man and woman and is depen­dent on rela­ti­onship with other human beings.

But what is the divi­ne in the exis­tence of man? Is it the upright walk? His abili­ty to think, or his intellect? The pro­blem with all the­se approa­ches is that one can always find an exam­p­le that con­tra­dicts them. For me, the best expl­ana­ti­on of man’s being in the image of God is found in man’s abili­ty to rela­te. This abili­ty to rela­te is not only in the inter­per­so­nal sphe­re, but much more in rela­ti­on to the divi­ne. This is what distin­gu­is­hes man, he can wor­ship. In addi­ti­on, he can also be crea­tively acti­ve. Man’s abili­ty to rela­te is shown by the fact that he is invol­ved in various rela­ti­onships. First­ly, the­se are the dif­fe­rent gene­ra­ti­ons, second­ly, the con­nec­tion to other crea­tures. Ani­mals can very well live wit­hout humans, but humans can­not live wit­hout them. Third­ly, this invol­vement is shown in the rela­ti­onship bet­ween man and woman.

Many peo­p­le today find it dif­fi­cult to belie­ve in a six-day crea­ti­on. The time peri­ods seem too short. What exci­tes me per­so­nal­ly about the idea of six-day crea­ti­on is that God has a posi­ti­ve rela­ti­onship to ever­y­thing he says. Ever­y­thing that exists is wil­led. This includes plants, enti­re land­scapes, rivers, oce­ans, ani­mals and humans. Abo­ve all this is a yes. A yes that lies out­side of the­se things them­sel­ves. This yes has its anchor point in the crea­ti­ve love of God. Wit­hout this love of God, no life can come into being and con­ti­nue to exist. This yes is also abo­ve your life. No mat­ter what your cir­cum­s­tances may be. God’s yes is abo­ve you. This yes of God does not mean that he also has a yes to ever­y­thing that hap­pens. But it is abo­ve the exis­tence of every sin­gle crea­tu­re. Yes, you are wan­ted, not a coin­ci­dence or an acci­dent, but lovin­g­ly crea­ted by God.

For the theo­lo­gi­an Micha­el Herbst, it is cru­cial for us humans to know that we were crea­ted as images of God. «Know­ledge wit­hout cer­tain­ty does us no good. We need cer­tain­ty about whe­re we come from, what we are here for, what we are allo­wed to do and what we are war­ned against, and whe­re we are going when the life we can weigh, mea­su­re and count comes to an end. (…) The ans­wer of faith is: cer­tain­ty comes from encoun­ter. Encoun­ter with the one who says and it hap­pens. Who says: Let the­re be light, and his word crea­tes what it says». (Micha­el Herbst). Through cer­tain­ty, the yes over one’s own life intensifies.

By being simi­lar to God, man is also given a respon­si­ble task in God’s crea­ti­on. Man is to rule over the world. But this rule is not to be unders­tood in such a way that ever­y­thing has to ser­ve man. Rather, God’s inten­ded rule of human beings over the world is loving. It is ori­en­ted towards the wel­fa­re of fel­low human beings and the world as a who­le. Peo­p­le need the earth, but they do not abu­se it. They want the best for God’s crea­ti­on and are not inte­res­ted in their own advantages.

2. the picture is crumbling and has cracks!

As well con­cei­ved as man’s respon­si­bi­li­ty for this world is, the image of man as ste­ward has migh­ty cracks and is crumbling bad­ly. Ins­tead of pre­ser­ving the world, huma­ni­ty is exploi­ting the earth. The irre­spon­si­bi­li­ty of human beings leads to God’s won­derful crea­ti­on being abu­sed for their own needs. Ani­mals are bred to pro­du­ce enough or to ser­ve as enter­tain­ment for peo­p­le. Forests are cle­ared so that the­re is enough ara­ble land for the fod­der indus­try. Moun­ta­ins are com­ple­te­ly cle­ared away to get coal or other metals. Was­te is dischar­ged direct­ly into the rivers whe­re it final­ly ends up in the sea and beco­mes the doom of many ani­mals. But humans do not only exploit the earth, they also exploit their fel­low human beings. The­re are mil­li­ons of so-cal­led cheap workers in poor count­ries, whe­re they work in the fields for a pit­tance, sew clo­thes in stuffy fac­to­ries or mine rare metals. But the­re are also many working poor in indus­tria­li­sed count­ries, child­ren who have to con­tri­bu­te to the family’s liveli­hood. Women who are forced into prostitution.

In short, man does not live up to his respon­si­bi­li­ty. The­r­e­fo­re, it is dif­fi­cult to belie­ve that man was crea­ted in the image of God. So it is hard­ly sur­pri­sing that many peo­p­le find it dif­fi­cult to belie­ve in such a state­ment. How can man be made in God’s image and yet act in this way? Espe­ci­al­ly in other human beings, who are also images of God? A par­ti­al ans­wer lies in the fact that man’s image of God con­sists of con­ti­nui­ty and rup­tu­re. On the one hand, human beings are images of God in terms of their abili­ty to rela­te. On the other hand, the rup­tu­re con­sists in the fact that man has cut off his rela­ti­onship with God of his own accord. Alt­hough man is only crea­ted in the image of God, he often beha­ves as if he were God hims­elf. He hims­elf has cut off the rela­ti­onship level upwards. As a human being wit­hout refe­rence to the divi­ne, he also lacks the refe­rence to what it means to be the image of God. In the fact that man is the image of God, the­re is also gre­at digni­ty, entit­le­ment and respon­si­bi­li­ty. But we humans tend to want to do ever­y­thing our­sel­ves. In doing so, we often miss the goal that God had for us. This miss­ing of the goal is cal­led sin in the Bible. Man can crea­te things anew and be crea­ti­ve. But he also has the ten­den­cy to seek his own good and work towards it.

The­r­e­fo­re, it can be said that the con­ti­nui­ty of being in the image of God is in the yes of God over man. The rup­tu­re, in turn, shows its­elf in man’s ten­den­cy to pur­sue his own goals. This ten­si­on is also found in man’s dealings with the world. On the one hand he has to pre­ser­ve it for his own sake, on the other hand he uses it to sur­vi­ve. In doing so, it can some­ti­mes swing to one side, but also to the other.

3. the intact, living image!

This immense respon­si­bi­li­ty, which weighs on man but which he does not live up to, can lead to des­pair. But the­re is hope for the who­le of crea­ti­on. The hope lies in Jesus Christ. He hims­elf is the int­act, living image of God and through him we can share in it.

The human con­di­ti­on, this con­ti­nui­ty and rup­tu­re can also be descri­bed as fol­lows: «Made by God in the image of God, made in the image of his Crea­tor, and yet deep­ly mark­ed, dis­fi­gu­red and now sepa­ra­ted from God, the source of life, even into his phy­si­cal life by the sin that so quick­ly cor­rupt­ed God’s good work.» (Hel­mut Egel­kraut). Sin is the pro­blem. It ali­en­ates man from God. But God is very con­cer­ned about his crea­tures. It tears at his heart that his images do not live in their desti­ny. But God has a solu­ti­on for the rup­tu­re – Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ, true God and true man, came into the world to res­to­re the image. He did this by going to the cross. On the cross he died for all the fail­ures of human pur­po­se, for all the sel­fi­sh­ness and rebel­li­on of human beings. Jesus Christ saw some­thing in us human beings that he saw as lova­ble. He saw this while we were still living in the mis­a­lignment. «Christ came at a time when we were still hel­p­less against sin, and he died for us who lived wit­hout God». (Romans 5:6 NLB). Peo­p­le who accept for them­sel­ves that Jesus Christ died for their fail­ures of pur­po­se and belie­ve in him are rene­wed by God in such a way that all peo­p­le reco­g­ni­se that they are like the image of their Crea­tor (Colos­si­ans 3:10). This is espe­ci­al­ly evi­dent in the fact that they have re-ente­red into a rela­ti­onship with the divine.

What does this look like in con­cre­te terms? How does this res­to­red rela­tio­nal capa­ci­ty of the human being show its­elf? I am deep­ly con­vin­ced that this shows its­elf in a lon­ging for God. A per­son who is open to the divi­ne again longs to know more of him. He sear­ches God’s Word for the Being who says you are my image. He wor­ships God, having rea­li­sed that God is still so much grea­ter than can be ima­gi­ned, and at the same time he says to each one: You are my bel­oved daugh­ter, my bel­oved son.

Jesus Christ lived a hop­eful exam­p­le for us of what respon­si­bi­li­ty as the image of God can look like. In his earth­ly life, Jesus Christ lovin­g­ly cared for all peo­p­le. He stood by the out­casts, cared for widows and took care of the sick. He hea­led many peo­p­le and taught his fol­lo­wers how to tre­at each other. Jesus» actions and words were cha­rac­te­ri­sed by the deep assump­ti­on that every human being is an image of God. In doing so, Jesus did ever­y­thing pos­si­ble to res­to­re the image of God in peo­p­le. At the same time, howe­ver, he did not refrain from poin­ting out to peo­p­le the errors of their ways and encou­ra­ging them to let go of them.

Peo­p­le who fol­low Jesus Christ are con­stant­ly chal­len­ged to ask what good I can do for my neigh­bour, who is also the image of God. In doing so, they are often in dan­ger of ben­ding God’s words and what He wants from them to fit the image of peo­p­le. But this is a serious mista­ke. For God was not crea­ted in the image of human beings, but the other way round. The­r­e­fo­re, the fol­lo­wers of Jesus must always ask what they can do to beco­me more like the image of God. The­r­e­fo­re, it is wort­hwhile to spend a lot of time with God. Becau­se the more we look to God, the more simi­lar we beco­me to Him.

Man is crea­ted in the image of God. He reflects God. In this sta­tus lies a tre­men­dous respon­si­bi­li­ty, which is incum­bent on man. Howe­ver, the image that peo­p­le pre­sent is crumbling and has migh­ty cracks. Man does not mana­ge to live up to his respon­si­bi­li­ty. But the­re is hope. In Jesus Christ we find the per­fect image of God – wit­hout scrat­ches. Fol­lo­wers of Jesus may share in the per­fect image of God through him. Through Jesus Christ they find their true desti­ny – to be God’s images.

Possible questions for the small group

Rea­ding the Bible text: Gene­sis 1:26–27

  1. What does it mean to you to be crea­ted in the image of God? Whe­re do you find this dif­fi­cult to belie­ve? Why?
  2. What are your rela­ti­onships like? What is your rela­ti­onship with God? How do you get in touch with him?
  3. What do you see as man’s grea­test respon­si­bi­li­ty? To what ext­ent does he live up to it?
  4. What do you see in your life as con­ti­nui­ty and rup­tu­re in the image of God?
  5. In what way did Jesus Christ over­co­me the rift? What effect does this have on your per­so­nal life?
  6. What form does being a fol­lower take? Is it along the lines of «I shape God in my image and ther­eby gain respon­si­bi­li­ty» or rather «I am the image of God and ther­eby take responsibility»?