Date: 23 April 2023 | Pre­a­cher:
Series: | Bible text: Gene­sis 10:1–7
Hint: This ser­mon has been machi­ne trans­la­ted. Plea­se note that we can­not accept any respon­si­bi­li­ty for the accu­ra­cy of the content.

Some pas­sa­ges in the Bible seem to dis­turb us. Becau­se they do not fit into our pic­tu­re, becau­se they do not cor­re­spond to what we would expect from God. The righ­teous­ness of God is depen­dent on his holi­ne­ss. Only when we bring this tog­e­ther do we under­stand why God acts dif­fer­ent­ly than we ima­gi­ne. In the face of things that do not cor­re­spond to God’s will, it is pre­cis­e­ly his jus­ti­ce that is reve­a­led. God can­not sim­ply lea­ve them as they are, but must do jus­ti­ce. Fol­lo­wers of Jesus Christ, on the other hand, should reco­g­ni­se this – even if it does not cor­re­spond to their own under­stan­ding of justice.


A just God encounters unjust people

Time and again I come across pas­sa­ges in the Bible that I don’t imme­dia­te­ly under­stand at first glan­ce. If it is still an Old Tes­ta­ment sto­ry, then they are some­ti­mes even rather dis­tur­bing. This mor­ning we want to enter into just such a sto­ry tog­e­ther. It is the sto­ry of Nad­ab and Abihu. They are the two eldest sons of Aaron. Aaron held the hig­hest reli­gious office, that of high priest. His sons were also priests by des­cent, but were sub­or­di­na­te to their father. We read that the two brot­hers took their cen­sers, put bur­ning coals in them and then sprink­led incen­se on them. They wan­ted to offer incen­se to God. Unfort­u­na­te­ly, howe­ver, they did this wit­hout any order from God, so his wrath struck them imme­dia­te­ly. A fire, pro­ba­b­ly light­ning, came from hea­ven and kil­led them both on the spot. This was no acci­dent or coin­ci­dence. Many tried to explain this wit­hout a super­na­tu­ral refe­rence, but the­se lead astray. Unfort­u­na­te­ly, we can­not avo­id see­ing the death of the­se two brot­hers as being brought about by God. God punis­hed them both with death. Imme­dia­te­ly after the death of his nephews, Moses, the brot­her of Aaron and lea­der of the peo­p­le, spo­ke the fol­lo­wing. «Moses said to Aaron: «Now is the time of the LORD’s word: On tho­se who are near me I will show mys­elf holy. Befo­re all the peo­p­le I will show my glo­ry.» But Aaron kept silent» (Exodus 10:3 NLB). What is exci­ting about this is the sober­ness with which Moses says this. He does not con­demn, does not reproach Aaron, but also does not try to excu­se God. He sim­ply says that God’s holi­ne­ss is shown in tho­se who are clo­se to him. Just as priests are by vir­tue of their office. Moses then has the two corp­ses quick­ly remo­ved from the sanc­tua­ry. He also gives the remai­ning priests an injunc­tion that they should not mourn. Ima­gi­ne this. Two of your sons have just died and you are not to mourn? You don’t want peo­p­le to noti­ce that you are sad. After all, Moses still gives per­mis­si­on for the peo­p­le to mourn them. But Aaron and his remai­ning two sons are not to mourn. Yes, he even threa­tens them with death if they mourn or lea­ve the ent­rance of the sanc­tua­ry. In this sto­ry, which is dif­fi­cult for us to clas­si­fy, God’s jus­ti­ce beco­mes visi­ble in its fullness.

Per­haps you are asking yours­elf: God’s jus­ti­ce? How can a God who acts like this be cal­led just? Yes, this sto­ry has very litt­le to do with jus­ti­ce for us. But «We can­not place God’s action in our sen­si­bi­li­ties becau­se we do not under­stand four basic bibli­cal con­cepts that are of cru­cial importance, name­ly. Holi­ne­ss, Jus­ti­ce, Sin and Mer­cy. […] we can­not begin to under­stand the mer­cy of God unless we have first gras­ped some aspects of his jus­ti­ce». (R.C. Sproul). For this sto­ry of Nad­ab and Abihu is not sim­ply iso­la­ted, but stands in the con­text of the pre­histo­ry. Tog­e­ther we want to del­ve deeper into the sto­ry and I hope I will suc­ceed in making God’s jus­ti­ce clear.

The tra­gic end of the two brot­hers has its ori­g­ins at the very begin­ning of human histo­ry. At that time, God crea­ted human beings to live in clo­se com­mu­ni­on with them. But the­re was a rift bet­ween God and human beings. Ins­tead of put­ting their trust in God, peo­p­le loo­ked for ano­ther way. As a result, they lost their posi­ti­on befo­re God – and what is even worse, the­re was a rift which from now on stands bet­ween God and man. But God accor­ding to his natu­re still seeks cont­act with his crea­tures. He still seeks the pre­sence of peo­p­le and wants them to put their trust in him. The­r­e­fo­re, he calls the peo­p­le of Isra­el as his own, set apart for him. But this can­not over­co­me the gulf that stands bet­ween God and us. For God can­not lie to hims­elf. He can­not appro­ve of any sel­fi­sh attempt by man. In the Bible, this is cal­led impu­re or even sin­ful beha­viour. The­r­e­fo­re, the peo­p­le whom he has cho­sen must offer sacri­fices to him. For the fact that the peo­p­le have sought their own way ins­tead of God Hims­elf is punis­ha­ble by death. The result of being far from God is death. This gap to God can only be bridged with blood. That is why the­re are dai­ly sacri­fices. Sacri­fices for various offen­ces and final­ly, once a year, a sacri­fice that brings the enti­re peo­p­le back into harm­o­ny with God.

God’s all-embracing justice

Man with his own ide­as of goals stands in stark con­trast to God’s all-embra­cing jus­ti­ce. It is pure grace that peo­p­le can meet God and not die imme­dia­te­ly. «For the wages of sin is death […]» (Romans 6:23 NLB). God puts the enforce­ment of his jus­ti­ce on hold. For all human beings would deser­ve to die. God’s pre­dic­tion to the first humans was that they would die if they ate from the tree of the know­ledge of good and evil. It was only by grace that God let peo­p­le still live, but even death was not sus­pen­ded, but defer­red. At the latest when we die on earth, the sepa­ra­ti­on from God final­ly emer­ges. The dif­fi­cul­ty with God’s jus­ti­ce is that it does not cor­re­spond to our sen­se of jus­ti­ce. We con­sider many things to be unjust that God does in order to satis­fy his jus­ti­ce. Or in other words, he acts in a way that cor­re­sponds to his under­stan­ding of justice.

This is also the case with the sto­ry of Nad­ab and Abihu. Howe­ver, befo­re we can put the sto­ry into con­text, it is important to look at the con­text. The two brot­hers were priests. The func­tion of the priest is to approach God (Eze­kiel 42:13). They were desti­ned for wor­ship and both had alre­a­dy expe­ri­en­ced and even sur­vi­ved an encoun­ter with God. «After­wards, Moses, Aaron, Nad­ab, Abihu and 70 of the lea­ding men of Isra­el went up the moun­tain. The­re they saw the God of Isra­el. The ground beneath his feet sho­ne like sap­phi­re, clear as the sky. And though the lea­ding men of Isra­el saw God, he did not kill them. Yes, they even ate and drank in his pre­sence!» (Exodus 24:9–11 NLB). So they alre­a­dy had a rela­ti­onship with God and saw him personally.

Short­ly befo­re the death of the two brot­hers, the priests offe­red the first sacri­fice. Aaron offe­red all the ope­ra and his sons assis­ted. At the end of the sacri­fices, God’s plea­su­re in the insti­tu­ti­on of the priestly sacri­fi­ci­al ser­vice was evi­dent. «Fire went out from him and con­su­med the burnt offe­ring and the pie­ces of fat on the altar. When the Israe­li­tes saw it, they shou­ted for joy and threw them­sel­ves to the ground». (Exodus 9:24 NLB). God hims­elf inau­gu­ra­ted the sacri­fi­ci­al ser­vice. He sent his fire.

So Abihu and Nad­ab had expe­ri­en­ced this and now they deci­ded to offer incen­se them­sel­ves. In doing so, they vio­la­ted seve­ral things. First­ly, they were offe­ring incen­se wit­hout aut­ho­ri­sa­ti­on. Bur­ning incen­se is the hig­hest and most solemn of all the duties of a priest. Second­ly, they offe­red it tog­e­ther. An incen­se offe­ring should always be per­for­med alo­ne. But in my view the worst offence was, third­ly, that they brought stran­ge fire befo­re the Lord. That is, they lit the incen­se them­sel­ves. If the who­le thing had been done out of igno­rance, then it would not have been punis­ha­ble by death, but the­re would have been the pos­si­bi­li­ty of the sin offe­ring. But the two offe­red the sacri­fice deli­bera­te­ly, pre­sump­tuous­ly and pro­ba­b­ly arro­gant­ly. They took them­sel­ves too serious­ly. God desi­res a dif­fe­rent approach. «Whoe­ver wants to boast, let him boast only about this one thing: that he knows me and under­stands that I am the LORD! I act lovin­g­ly and pro­vi­de jus­ti­ce and righ­teous­ness on earth, for that plea­ses me. I, the LORD, have spo­ken!» (Jere­mi­ah 9:23 NLB). The two died becau­se the wages of man’s sel­fi­sh­ness is death. It is an anti­ci­pa­ti­on of what threa­tens all peo­p­le – death.

The­r­e­fo­re Aaron was not allo­wed to mourn. For as priests, Aaron and his sons stood befo­re God and had to shun any­thing that dis­qua­li­fied them from wor­ship. Moreo­ver, their mour­ning would have sym­bo­li­sed that God’s punish­ment was unjust. But God is a holy and just God. It is only in con­trast to sin that God’s jus­ti­ce is reve­a­led. God’s jus­ti­ce can also mean punish­ment. If, for exam­p­le, I am guil­ty of some­thing in traf­fic, then I am threa­ten­ed with punish­ment. If I am not held accoun­ta­ble for a crime I have com­mit­ted, then jus­ti­ce has not been ser­ved. We too often equa­te God’s jus­ti­ce with posi­ti­ve appr­oval of our own choices. But God can­not be indif­fe­rent to our wrong choices. For this would be indif­fe­rence to the fact that he is God, Holy! In our under­stan­ding, the punish­ment must not exceed the deed. For an Israe­li­te it was clear that God is always just in his jud­ge­ment (Gene­sis 28:25). For God can­not be unjust becau­se his jus­ti­ce is holy.

Acknowledge God’s justice!

What do we humans have to oppo­se God’s jus­ti­ce? God’s jus­ti­ce must be satis­fied. The­r­e­fo­re, blood had to be shed, which ran­so­med us humans, inde­ed the enti­re world, and bro­ke through the power of death. Jesus Christ had to die so that the path to God could be cle­ared. «For God was in Christ, and so recon­ci­led the world to hims­elf, and coun­ted no more men’s sins against them. This is the glo­rious mes­sa­ge of recon­ci­lia­ti­on […]» (2 Corin­thi­ans 5:19 NLB). Through Jesus Christ we have been jus­ti­fied. Jus­ti­fi­ca­ti­on means that the rela­ti­onship bet­ween God and human beings has been res­to­red. When we belie­ve in Jesus Christ, we share in his sub­sti­tu­tio­na­ry death and resur­rec­tion. Faith alo­ne can save us. Not high-han­ded or well-inten­tio­ned actions. We are not righ­teous­ly spo­ken of becau­se of pri­de in our achie­ve­ment, becau­se of our abili­ty, or becau­se of a spe­cial posi­ti­on. But through Jesus Christ alo­ne. Theo­lo­gi­cal­ly spea­king: The ato­n­ing death of Jesus Christ was the jus­ti­fied sacri­fice that ren­ders us righ­teous. Nad­ab and Abihu did not trust God. The­r­e­fo­re, death, which threa­tens every human being becau­se of the will to do things for ones­elf, was preferred.

Fol­lo­wers of Jesus Christ ack­now­ledge that they owe ever­y­thing to Him. They them­sel­ves could not accom­plish the ope­ra that God deman­ded. They reco­g­ni­se that all their own efforts are fruit­less and unsuc­cessful. This is expres­sed at bap­tism. The death of Jesus Christ on the cross and his resur­rec­tion are sym­bo­li­cal­ly ree­nac­ted through the des­cent and reap­pearance. Fur­ther­mo­re, a chan­ge is wit­nessed. Name­ly, the chan­ge from trus­ting in ones­elf to put­ting all one’s trust in God.

Nad­ab and Abihu saw with their father how a pro­per sacri­fi­ci­al ser­vice should be per­for­med. They saw how God took plea­su­re in it. So they wan­ted to expe­ri­ence this them­sel­ves. They copied, made things the same, but for sel­fi­sh reasons. So fol­lo­wers of Jesus Christ also face this dan­ger. On the one hand, we may hear about mira­cles, healings of the sick, etc. and want to act 1:1 like that. We pro­mi­se our­sel­ves the same result by copy­ing. But behind this lies a magi­cal idea of God. Name­ly, that I can make God available to me. But God alo­ne gives this. On the other hand, this sto­ry shows that we humans are quick­ly in dan­ger of wan­ting to misu­se God for our own things. He has to take the rap for our repu­ta­ti­on, for our pro­spe­ri­ty or for our ide­as. But this is con­tra­ry to God’s jus­ti­ce. For God’s jus­ti­ce means God’s faithful­ness to his pro­mi­ses, to his peo­p­le. But it also includes the faithful­ness of peo­p­le who say that they put all their trust in God. This is shown in the inner atti­tu­de of fol­lo­wers of Jesus Christ, but also in their outer beha­viour. In this way, the words Moses said to Aaron also beco­me visi­ble in the lives of tho­se who put their trust in Jesus Christ. «Now is coming to pass what the Lord has fore­told: I will show mys­elf holy in tho­se who are clo­se to me. I will show my glo­ry befo­re all the peo­p­le. […]» (Deu­te­ro­no­my 10:3 NLB).

Possible questions for the small group 

Read the Bible text: Deu­te­ro­no­my 10:1–7 (sup­ple­men­ta­ry the who­le chap­ter 10)

  1. What does this sto­ry do to you? What bothers you, may­be even upsets you? Whe­re do you not under­stand God?
  2. What does jus­ti­ce mean to you? Does your idea dif­fer when you think of jus­ti­ce in ever­y­day life or the jus­ti­ce of God?
  3. How would you descri­be the jus­ti­ce of God?
  4. How are grace, righ­teous­ness, sin and holi­ne­ss rela­ted? What do you under­stand least? What is the con­nec­tion bet­ween God’s holi­ne­ss and justice?
  5. Do you under­stand jus­ti­fi­ca­ti­on by faith alone?
  6. Whe­re are you in dan­ger of try­ing to instru­men­ta­li­se God? How does God’s jus­ti­ce show its­elf in your life?