Date: 21 June 2020 | Pre­a­cher:
Series: | Bible text: Gene­sis 13–14+19
Hint: This ser­mon has been machi­ne trans­la­ted. Plea­se note that we can­not accept any respon­si­bi­li­ty for the accu­ra­cy of the content.

It seems as if Lot had no ethi­cal com­pass, just drifted along and took the path of least resis­tance. Accor­din­gly, his life resem­bles a series of mis­for­tu­nes. How can we make wise and sus­tainable choices in our lives? Despi­te ever­y­thing, Lot goes down in histo­ry as a «righ­teous man». This has much to do with the pray­er of his uncle Abraham.


Lot, Abraham’s nephew, had many things wrong with him. But the­re is no exam­p­le too bad to learn some­thing from – even if it is only what we should not do. Lot helps us through his life expe­ri­en­ces on how to make good choices in life.

Egoistic decisions

Abra­ham and Lot were nomads who both rai­sed their own com­pa­ny con­sis­ting of ani­mals and men. Abra­ham at that time alre­a­dy had 318 batt­le-har­den­ed men at his side (Gene­sis 14:14), plus wives, lar­ge herds of catt­le and ple­nty of sil­ver and gold (Gene­sis 13:2). «Lot, who went with Abram, also owned many sheep, cows and tents, so the­re was not enough pas­tu­re for all the ani­mals. Their pos­ses­si­ons were too lar­ge to live tog­e­ther» (13,5f NL). Becau­se the she­p­herds of the two CEO’s were stan­ding on each other’s feet, they argued with each other. «Abram dis­cus­sed the mat­ter with Lot. «This stri­fe bet­ween you and me and bet­ween your she­p­herds and my she­p­herds must come to an endhe said. «After all, we are rela­ted to each other! It’s bet­ter if we sepa­ra­te. The who­le coun­try is in front of you. If you want to move to the left, I will move to the right. But if you go to the right, I will turn to the left.» » (13,8f NL).

On one side lay the Jor­dan Val­ley, well wate­red and fer­ti­le like the Gar­den of Eden or Egypt. On the other side was the bar­ren moun­tai­nous land of the Negev. Lot did not need time to think, he cho­se the fer­ti­le plain of the Jor­dan Val­ley. The cri­ter­ion for his decis­i­on was sole­ly ego­ism and his own advan­ta­ge. He could just as well have left the good land to his uncle accor­ding to the prin­ci­ple of age-honour. What is the basis of our decisions?

So Lot cho­se the Jor­dan Val­ley, the very area that is now the sub­ject of fier­ce dis­pu­te. On 1 July, Prime Minis­ter Ben­ja­min Net­an­ya­hu wants to annex tho­se ter­ri­to­ries in the West Bank that Donald Trump’s so-cal­led Plan of the Cen­tu­ry allo­ca­tes to Isra­el. Howe­ver, the­re is mas­si­ve oppo­si­ti­on to annex­ing the ter­ri­to­ry Isra­el has occu­p­ied sin­ce 1967 – inclu­ding from Israe­li secu­ri­ty experts. Per­haps poli­ti­ci­ans should learn from Abram’s broad-mindedness.

As soon as Lot had moved east­wards with his troop, Abram recei­ved a hand­shake from God in the form of a pro­mi­se of bles­sing for the land of Cana­an in which he remain­ed (13:14ff). The rest of the sto­ry impres­si­ve­ly shows that it is bet­ter to be in the place whe­re God bles­ses ins­tead of the place from which we per­so­nal­ly expect the grea­test benefits.

Soon Lot and his peo­p­le were taken pri­soners of war. When Abram heard of this, he went out with his 318 batt­le-har­den­ed men and freed his «nephew and all his pos­ses­si­ons, all the women and all the other pri­soners»(14:16 NL). Some time later, Lot was visi­ted by two angels. He forced them to spend the night with him. Bet­ween a deli­cious din­ner and brushing their tee­th, a mob makes a racket at Lot’s front door. They demand the two guests so that they can satis­fy them­sel­ves on them. Lot nego­tia­tes: « «My brot­hershe asked, «do not com­mit such a crime! Look, I have two daugh­ters who have never slept with a man. I can bring them out to you. Do with them what you will» » (19,7f NL). Ori­en­tal hos­pi­ta­li­ty weighs more hea­vi­ly on Lot than con­cern for his own child­ren. He would have sacri­fi­ced his daugh­ters for his repu­ta­ti­on. For­t­u­na­te­ly, the two angels were able to pre­vent the sexu­al abu­se. Sub­se­quent­ly, Lot’s fami­ly fled away from Sodom as the angels razed the city to the ground. «Then the LORD rai­ned fire and brims­tone from hea­ven on Sodom and Gomor­rah.» (19.24 NL).

At this point, all that was left of all his pos­ses­si­ons was Lot and his two daugh­ters. Out of fear, he retrea­ted with them to a cave up in the hill coun­try. «One day the older daugh­ter said to the youn­ger one: «Here the­re is no man far and wide with whom we can sleep, and our father is old. Come, let’s get him drunk with wine and then sleep with him. This is how we will beco­me child­ren through our father» «(19:31f NL). No soo­ner said than done. Nine months later two sons were born, named Moab and Ben-Ammi. They beca­me the pro­ge­ni­tors of the Moa­bi­tes and Ammo­ni­tes. The­se two peo­p­les would later make life dif­fi­cult for the peo­p­le of Israel.

It seems as if Lot had no ethi­cal com­pass, just drifted along and took the path of least resis­tance. It seems he never wrest­led with dif­fi­cult ques­ti­ons like: What are the future con­se­quen­ces of my decis­i­on? or I won­der what God wants me to do. Ins­tead, he lived for the moment.

Good decisions

A lea­der once said: «No one is dri­ven by chan­ce in a direc­tion that hono­urs God.» Lot is an exam­p­le of how we should not live. At no stage of his life was he a bles­sing to tho­se around him. No salt and light far and wide, except for his wife, who beca­me the Saltpil­lar ;-) fro­ze becau­se she loo­ked back against the ins­truc­tion of the angels (19,26).

How can we make good decis­i­ons in our lives so that we are not always con­cer­ned with our repu­ta­ti­on and plea­su­re, but with the good of other peo­p­le? Becau­se that is pre­cis­e­ly the mea­ning of life. Moni­ka Dei­ten­beck-Gose­berg: «We are on this earth so that it beco­mes easier for others to live, to love, to suf­fer, to belie­ve through our exis­tence. That is the pur­po­se of our lives.»

  • One of the world’s most important manage­ment thin­kers is Clay­ton Chris­ten­sen, a Har­vard pro­fes­sor, leads his life with vows – an old term for a pro­mi­se that can­not be bro­ken. One can also call this an «abso­lu­te com­mit­ment». In his youn­ger years, Chris­ten­sen obser­ved many mana­gers who sacri­fi­ced the first part of their lives exclu­si­ve­ly to their care­ers in order to be able to devo­te them­sel­ves enti­re­ly to their fami­lies in the second half of their lives – by now finan­ci­al­ly inde­pen­dent. The only trou­ble was that the­se fami­lies were often eit­her bro­ken up or had long sin­ce left. So Chris­ten­sen took a vow and pro­mi­sed God not to work on weekends and to be home for din­ner on week­days. Which meant he some­ti­mes left for work at three in the mor­ning. Why not deci­de on a case-by-case basis?
  • In 1519, the Spa­nish con­quis­ta­dor Her­n­an Cor­tés rea­ched the coast of Mexi­co. Wit­hout fur­ther ado, he declared Mexi­co a Spa­nish colo­ny and hims­elf its gover­nor. He then had his ships sunk and depri­ved hims­elf and his tro­ops of the oppor­tu­ni­ty to return. Why did Cor­tés give up his free­dom of choice?
  • Peo­p­le ask me again and again whe­ther I cycle to work in all wea­thers and at all times of the year. Yes, this is part of my vow and I don’t have to deci­de from case to case.
  • I remem­ber one of my youth lea­ders from the past. He told us that he wan­ted to live accor­ding to Job 31:1. «I have made a coven­ant with my eyes that I will not look at a vir­gin with a cove­tous gaze»(NL). Why not deci­de on a case-by-case basis?
  • Based on a recent expe­ri­ence, I inte­gra­ted my inner com­mit­ment to address peo­p­le who I feel have some­thing against me.
  • Sin­ce my app­ren­ti­ce­ship days, one of my vows has been to invest a month­ly tithe from my wages in the cau­se of God.

It is good to have a clear com­pass of values in the big issues of life like money, sex and power. If you have to make new decis­i­ons from situa­ti­on to situa­ti­on, you lose will­power. Decis­i­on Fati­gue («decis­i­on fati­gue») is the sci­en­ti­fic term for it. A brain tired of many decis­i­ons will opt for the most con­ve­ni­ent opti­on – and that is not infre­quent­ly the worst. Once we have made a com­mit­ment, we do not have to weigh up the pros and cons each time. The decis­i­on is alre­a­dy made and cos­ts us litt­le energy.

But then the­re are the decis­i­ons that are not cover­ed by this. The­re I agree with the Ame­ri­can Pre­si­dent Har­ry Tru­man (1884–1972). When a staff mem­ber pre­sen­ted him with a decis­i­on, his stan­dard ques­ti­on was: «How much time do I have? One week, two days, one hour or five minu­tes?His mot­to: «Never deci­de ear­lier than neces­sa­ry. Use any available space for cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­on. But when the time comes, strike and deci­de. Using the given time does not mean being pas­si­ve and wai­ting for the famous let­ter from hea­ven. It is a living space full of inner work, fac­tu­al cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­on and dia­lo­gue with God.

When we deci­de quick­ly, emo­ti­ons play too big a role. Eit­her it hits a «good» ner­ve and we are imme­dia­te­ly on fire. In this sta­te we deci­de things that we may reg­ret later. Or the request goes «against the grain» and we deci­de against it, even though a cou­ra­ge­ous decis­i­on would be right and God wants to «enlar­ge our ter­ri­to­ry» through it.

 

Lot was neither salt nor light for tho­se around him. Com­ple­te­ly sur­pri­sin­gly, he nevert­hel­ess goes down in histo­ry as a «just man». The reason: He left Sodom and let hims­elf be saved (2 Peter 2:7f). In con­trast, Jesus needs Lot’s wife as a war­ning exam­p­le. She clung to the old life and could not part with her pre­vious home and pos­ses­si­ons. That is why it peri­s­hed with Sodom. Jesus makes the sto­ry red-hot: «And the world will be as it was in the days of Lot. The peo­p­le went about their dai­ly busi­ness – eating and drin­king, buy­ing and sel­ling, plan­ting and buil­ding – until the mor­ning when Lot left Sodom.»(Luke 17:28f NL). Accor­ding to Jesus, today’s world func­tions Sodom-style: eat, drink, buy, sell, plant, build. Tho­se who let them­sel­ves drift through life by chan­ce exhaust them­sel­ves in tri­via­li­ties and obsti­nacy. The fire that fell on Sodom equa­tes Jesus with his coming again. And then the­re is only one ques­ti­on in the room: Did you make the right decis­i­on and lea­ve Sodom behind? How can it be that Lot mes­sed up so much and yet is saved in the end? The secret was Abraham’s pray­er: «But God had heard Abraham’s request: He had des­troy­ed the cities whe­re Lot had lived, but had brought Lot hims­elf to safe­ty.» (Gene­sis 19:29 NL). This is an encou­ra­ge­ment for all peo­p­le who pray for the sal­va­ti­on and redemp­ti­on of their loved ones. Your pray­er has an effect, even if the oppo­si­te seems to be the case.

 

 

 

Possible questions for the small groups

Read the Bible text: Luke 17:20–37

  1. Are you curr­ent­ly in a decis­i­on-making pha­se? How do you make your decisions?
  2. What vows do you live your life by? Explain your inner com­pass of values!
  3. What do you think of the Tru­man Prin­ci­ple? What are the pos­si­ble advan­ta­ges of it?
  4. Jesus com­pa­res life in Sodom with the situa­ti­on in the end times. To what ext­ent does Lot ser­ve as a model for us?
  5. What fee­lings does the thought of Jesus coming back trig­ger in you?