Body & Faith | Finding a healthy identity

Date: 23 March 2025 | Pre­a­cher:
Series: | Bible text: Gala­ti­ans 3:26–28; Matthew 19:10–12
Hint: This ser­mon has been machi­ne trans­la­ted. Plea­se note that we can­not accept any respon­si­bi­li­ty for the accu­ra­cy of the content.

A per­son who enters into a per­so­nal rela­ti­onship with Jesus Christ is given a com­pre­hen­si­ve iden­ti­ty that inte­gra­tes all par­ti­al iden­ti­ties: He is a bel­oved child of God who belongs to the fami­ly of God. This main iden­ti­ty also includes our sexu­al iden­ti­ty and gives it the right signi­fi­can­ce. Jesus hims­elf tea­ches in the New Tes­ta­ment what a good approach to sexu­al incli­na­ti­ons should look like.


Who am I? This ques­ti­on occu­p­ies us humans more or less all our lives. Pos­si­ble ans­wers are: Mother of child­ren, mana­ger, FC Aar­au fan, Swiss, hete­ro­se­xu­al or homo­se­xu­al. We are always a mix of par­ti­al iden­ti­ties. If we start to prio­ri­ti­se one part over ano­ther, it can lead to con­flict and break up our iden­ti­ty. One defi­ni­ti­on of healt­hy iden­ti­ty is: the sta­te in which someone or some­thing is at one with its­elf. When cer­tain aspects of our iden­ti­ty are in con­flict with each other, we feel bro­ken inside.

A comprehensive identity

Jesus also had many par­ti­al iden­ti­ties: He was the son of Mary and Joseph, a sin­gle man, a rab­bi, a Jew from Beth­le­hem, who grew up in Naza­reth. Then came the day of his bap­tism. After he emer­ged from the water, the fol­lo­wing hap­pen­ed: «And a voice from hea­ven said: «This is my bel­oved Son, in him I have gre­at joy.» (Matthew 3:17 NLB). This pro­mi­se from the Father defi­nes the com­pre­hen­si­ve iden­ti­ty of Jesus: He was abo­ve all others the bel­oved Son of God. All other par­ti­al iden­ti­ties were enve­lo­ped in this moment of bap­tism by the Father’s pro­mi­se that He loves Jesus and has gre­at joy in Him.

Bap­tism is the mile­stone on a person’s path to start­ing a life as a fol­lower of Jesus. From this moment on, a new iden­ti­ty encom­pas­ses all pre­vious par­ti­al iden­ti­ties. If we ent­rust our lives to Jesus Christ, we can be child­ren of God. And it is also true for you that the hea­ven­ly Father loves you and takes gre­at plea­su­re in you.

Paul descri­bes this radi­cal pro­cess of a com­pre­hen­si­ve new iden­ti­ty: «And so you are all child­ren of God through faith in Jesus Christ. For all of you who have been bap­ti­sed into Christ now belong to Christ. Now the­re is no lon­ger Jew or Gen­ti­le, slave or free, male or fema­le. For you are all the same – you are one in Jesus Christ» (Gala­ti­ans 3:26–28 NLB). This is exci­ting: Paul says that through the com­pre­hen­si­ve new iden­ti­ty, the many par­ti­al iden­ti­ties lose their signi­fi­can­ce and fade away. Our natio­nal iden­ti­ty (Jew or Gen­ti­le), social iden­ti­ty (slave or free), and sexu­al iden­ti­ty (male or fema­le) are irrele­vant to our iden­ti­ty as bel­oved child­ren of God.

We first have to «take this in»: The main iden­ti­ty of a fol­lower of Jesus is to be a bel­oved child of God. Fami­ly con­nec­tion. Belon­ging to God’s house­hold. Access to the fri­dge with all the sup­pli­es. The front door opens with our fin­ger­print if the Father is not alre­a­dy stan­ding in front of it with open arms.

The physical part identity

We are living in an exci­ting time as far as a person’s sexu­al iden­ti­ty is con­cer­ned. As alre­a­dy men­tio­ned seve­ral times, the leit­mo­tif in this respect is I am what I feel like. This basic fee­ling is appli­ed to one’s own sexu­al par­ti­al iden­ti­ty and sexu­al orientation.

Sin­ce 2014, Face­book has offe­red around 60 ways to spe­ci­fy your gen­der. As the body is no lon­ger a fixed ori­en­ta­ti­on, many peo­p­le have a fra­gi­le sexu­al iden­ti­ty. They feel home­l­ess in their own body. A trans woman said the fol­lo­wing to a pas­tor who had pre­a­ched about the high value of the body: «I’ve never heard such a high view of my body as the one you told me. I wish my psych­ia­trist had told me the same thing back then.» Accor­ding to the crea­ti­on account, God crea­ted man as male and fema­le (Gene­sis 1:27). And Paul empha­si­s­es in 1 Corin­thi­ans 6:12–20 that our sexua­li­ty is loca­ted in our bodies. Why does the body have to be sub­or­di­na­te to fee­lings? In the area of sexua­li­ty, the oppo­si­te path is in line with the Bible and the­r­e­fo­re more pro­mi­sing and ful­fil­ling.

Ano­ther con­tro­ver­si­al topic is the Mar­ria­ge for all. If anyo­ne, be it an inte­rest group or a govern­ment, sud­den­ly chan­ges the mea­ning of key words, we should be alert, becau­se then an ideo­lo­gy makes room for its­elf. I recent­ly read that in con­nec­tion with the assis­ted sui­ci­de Words like Sui­ci­de or Kil­ling should no lon­ger be used becau­se it impli­es not doing so. The slo­gan of the Asso­cia­ti­on for Huma­ne Dying Exit is the­r­e­fo­re Self-deter­mi­ned living. Acti­ve eutha­na­sia thus takes on a new mea­ning and paves the way for itself.

We are living in a time in which the term Mar­ria­ge is reinter­pre­ted. For thou­sands of years, mar­ria­ge impli­ed a rela­ti­onship bet­ween a man and a woman across cul­tures. Now, when we sud­den­ly talk about mar­ria­ges bet­ween two men or two women, the word Mar­ria­ge radi­cal­ly chan­ged. For the time being, this obser­va­ti­on has not­hing to do with a spe­ci­fi­cal­ly Chris­ti­an world­view. On the basis of a Judeo-Chris­ti­an world­view, the nar­ra­ti­ve of the Bible plays an important role. At the very begin­ning of the Bible, in the crea­ti­on account, we encoun­ter a repea­ting pola­ri­ty. God crea­ted the hea­vens and the earth, the sea and the land, day and night, etc. and, last but not least, man and woman. God forms com­ple­men­ta­ry pairs that are meant to work tog­e­ther. In the last sce­ne of the Bible, God crea­tes the new hea­ven and the new earth. The sym­bol for this is the mar­ria­ge of Christ and his church. The enti­re bibli­cal nar­ra­ti­ve works with pola­ri­ty and com­ple­men­ta­ri­ty. The man-woman mar­ria­ge is a sign­post and sign of the good­ness of the ori­gi­nal crea­ti­on and God’s inten­ti­on for the coming new hea­ven and the new earth. With the ope­ning up of mar­ria­ge to same-sex cou­ples, the term Mar­ria­ge and rob­bed of its deepest mea­ning and mys­tery. Mar­ria­ges are thus down­gra­ded to social or sexu­al arrangements.

Recommendations from Jesus

Nevert­hel­ess, the­re are peo­p­le who feel homo­se­xu­al in their par­ti­al iden­ti­ty of sexua­li­ty. To find out how fol­lo­wers of Jesus can deal with this, let’s knock on the door of Jesus hims­elf. Let’s be clear about one thing: Jesus does not endor­se con­ver­sa­tio­nal the­ra­py, so neither should we. If a per­son is also chan­ged in their sexu­al iden­ti­ty through accep­ting a com­pre­hen­si­ve pri­ma­ry iden­ti­ty and inner heal­ing, this is a gift.

Despi­te the cata­stro­phe of the fall of man­kind, which befell the world and many things no lon­ger cor­re­spond to God’s good idea of crea­ti­on, Jesus con­firms the ori­gi­nal order of crea­ti­on in Matthew 19. Man was crea­ted as man and woman and mono­ga­mous mar­ria­ge bet­ween man and woman remains God’s idea. Jesus also talks about the path a per­son can take if their sexua­li­ty does not cor­re­spond to the ide­al. Jesus was the­r­e­fo­re well awa­re that not ever­y­thing is as it was in paradise.

«Then the disci­ples said to Jesus: «Then it would be bet­ter not to mar­ry at all! 11 «Not ever­yo­ne can under­stand this,» said Jesus. «Only tho­se whom God helps can do this. 12 Some are born inca­pa­ble of mar­ria­ge, others are made inca­pa­ble by peo­p­le, and still others have cho­sen not to mar­ry for the sake of the king­dom of hea­ven. Whoe­ver can under­stand this, let him act accor­din­gly» » (Matthew 19:10–12 NLB). Trans­la­ti­ons that stay clo­ser to the Greek text use the word «eunuchs» three times in v. 12. It then sounds like this: «For the­re are tho­se who have been cir­cumcis­ed from birth, and the­re are tho­se who have been cir­cumcis­ed by men, and the­re are tho­se who have cir­cumcis­ed them­sel­ves for the sake of the king­dom of hea­ven» (Matthew 19:12 LUT).

The term «the recon­ci­led» is alre­a­dy used in Isai­ah 56:4 and refers to sexu­al mino­ri­ties. In this pro­phe­cy, it is a pro­mi­se that the day will come when «cut» peo­p­le will also have access to the king­dom of God. In the SRF pro­gram­me «Que­er in der Frei­kir­che», it was said that many free churches belie­ve that homo­se­xua­li­ty or trans is a life­style that leads to hell. This state­ment is con­tra­dic­ted here.

Jesus men­ti­ons three cate­go­ries of «cut ones»: (1.) Blen­ded from birth: This could also refer to inter­sex peo­p­le. In other words, peo­p­le who­se sexu­al cha­rac­te­ristics do not cle­ar­ly indi­ca­te whe­ther they are male or fema­le. (2.) Men who were emas­cu­la­tedThe­re were eunuchs working at the roy­al palace and the ter­ri­ble prac­ti­ce of emas­cu­la­ting pri­soners of war. At that time, repre­sen­ta­ti­ves of such sexu­al mino­ri­ties had no access to the temp­le. Jesus is revo­lu­tio­na­ry when He says here that such peo­p­le are wel­co­me in the king­dom of God. Jesus then adds a third cate­go­ry: Peo­p­le who deci­de not to mar­ry out of their own free will. Here, Jesus radi­cal­ly rethinks what it means to have a new com­pre­hen­si­ve iden­ti­ty. Until then, it was nor­mal in Juda­ism to get mar­ried. Ever­y­thing else was view­ed cri­ti­cal­ly. What Jesus is say­ing here is that peo­p­le can live wit­hout sex, but not wit­hout a fami­ly. An artic­le in the Aar­gau­er Zei­tung said that sex is not a human right. Mar­ria­ge and bio­lo­gi­cal fami­ly is not the most important thing, the king­dom of God and his fami­ly is. Unfort­u­na­te­ly, churches like ours have a ten­den­cy to glo­ri­fy mar­ria­ge and having child­ren. But it is wrong for us to con­vey that this is the hig­hest of all goals.

In the view of theo­lo­gi­ans, this group also includes peo­p­le who have homo­se­xu­al fee­lings. It is clear that we do not ask peo­p­le who are not in Christ and He is not in them not to live out their homo­se­xua­li­ty. But if we fol­low Jesus, it is worth lis­tening to God’s ins­truc­tions for a ful­fil­led life. Lived homo­se­xua­li­ty does not cor­re­spond to the idea, the design of God. That is why Jesus opens a door here and says: peo­p­le who have homo­se­xu­al fee­lings should live a celi­ba­te life, i.e. becau­se of the king­dom of God renoun­ce mar­ria­ge – like Jesus and Paul. That is a high stan­dard and it is dif­fi­cult to uphold. You are very quick­ly bran­ded as discriminatory.

How can we as a church pro­vi­de a space of safe­ty, grace and secu­ri­ty for such peo­p­le? (1.) Peo­p­le of all sexu­al ori­en­ta­ti­ons are very wel­co­me. (2.) We are not moral guar­di­ans. Your sexu­al ori­en­ta­ti­on is not the most important part of your iden­ti­ty. You are a child of God first. (3.) We fol­low the tea­chings of Jesus, even in the way we live out our sexua­li­ty.

The most important mes­sa­ge is: Through faith in Jesus Christ, a per­son is gran­ted a new, com­pre­hen­si­ve iden­ti­ty: Bel­oved child of God. Anyo­ne who can grasp this is given a new foun­da­ti­on and a new frame of refe­rence for all their sub-iden­ti­ties. «And so you are all child­ren of God through faith in Jesus Christ. For all of you who have been bap­ti­sed into Christ now belong to Christ. Now the­re is no lon­ger Jew or Gen­ti­le, slave or free, male or fema­le. For you are all the same – you are one in Jesus Christ» (Gala­ti­ans 3:26–28 NLB).

 

Possible questions for the small groups

Read the Bible text: Gala­ti­ans 3:26–28; Matthew 19:10–12

  1. What is your first ans­wer to the ques­ti­on of who you are? Which par­ti­al iden­ti­ties belong to you?
  2. Have you alre­a­dy been given the com­pre­hen­si­ve main iden­ti­ty? What does it mean to you in your life?
  3. What role does the body play in our sexu­al iden­ti­ty? How could a hig­her view of the value of our bodies help?
  4. What do you think of Jesus» recom­men­da­ti­on that peo­p­le can live wit­hout sex but not wit­hout a family?
  5. How can we as see­tal chi­le beco­me a place of grace for peo­p­le from sexu­al mino­ri­ties? What is the balan­ce bet­ween clear values and openness?