Date: 9 May 2021 | Pre­a­cher:
Series: | Bible text: Matthew 5:31–32, 19:3–10
Hint: This ser­mon has been machi­ne trans­la­ted. Plea­se note that we can­not accept any respon­si­bi­li­ty for the accu­ra­cy of the content.

In the Ser­mon on the Mount, Jesus also speaks about mar­ria­ge and divorce. Becau­se the mar­ria­ge coven­ant is fun­da­men­tal­ly holy and indis­so­lu­b­le, he does so very rest­ric­tively. The only reason that legi­ti­mi­ses divorce and remar­ria­ge is for­ni­ca­ti­on. Jesus can pro­ba­b­ly only set such a high stan­dard becau­se he crea­tes a new heart in his fol­lo­wers and thus enables them to be faithful and to love.


 

Mar­ria­ge is a clois­ter that God has cho­sen to make us more like Him. Meta­mor­pho­sis pur­sues the same goal. This means that mar­ria­ge can be a cata­lyst towards God-liken­ess. That is why Jesus in his tea­ching on vir­tue, in the Ser­mon on the Mount, also speaks about mar­ria­ge: «You have heard that the Law of Moses says: «A man may divorce his wife if he gives her a bill of divorce­ment». But I say: If a man divorces his wife – unless she has been unfaithful – he makes her an adul­ter­ess. And whoe­ver mar­ries a divorced woman also com­mits adul­tery»(Matthew 5:31–32 NLB). God is not con­cer­ned with regu­la­ting divorces fair­ly through legal rules. Rather, it is about pro­mo­ting coven­ant vir­tu­es such as faithful­ness and love. He wants us to be so shaped in our hearts by the music of God that we begin to live our lives auto­ma­ti­cal­ly in harm­o­ny with His music.

Marriage

The basic prin­ci­ple in Juda­ism is: mar­ria­ge is sacred. This is even expres­sed in the name for mar­ria­ge: kid­dus­hin means Sanc­ti­fi­ca­ti­on. In a Jewish wed­ding cerem­o­ny, when the groom puts the ring on the bri­de, the who­le wed­ding par­ty shouts loud­ly: «Meku­de­schet, Meku­de­schet, Meku­de­schet!» – Sanc­ti­fied! Sanc­ti­fied! Sanctified!

Holy is that which belongs to the holy, to God. For God, mar­ria­ge is some­thing so gre­at that he made it the image of his love for us humans: «I enter into mar­ria­ge with you for all time; my bridal gift to you is my help and pro­tec­tion, my love, my mer­cy and my unchan­ging faithful­ness. You will reco­g­ni­se who I am – I, the Lord»(Hosea 2:21f GNB). Some peo­p­le think that mar­ria­ge is a human inven­ti­on and cul­tu­ral­ly depen­dent. Accor­ding to the bibli­cal world­view, it is an ori­gi­nal inven­ti­on of the Crea­tor, which includes legal aspects (civil mar­ria­ge) as well as the making of the coven­ant befo­re God.

Jesus says: «The­r­e­fo­re a man shall lea­ve his father and mother and clea­ve to his wife, and the two shall beco­me one fle­sh. So they are no lon­ger two, but one fle­sh. What the­r­e­fo­re God has joi­n­ed tog­e­ther, let not man put asun­der!»(Matthew 19:5f LUT). Accor­ding to God’s unbre­aka­ble faithful­ness to us, we are also to be faithful to each other in the mar­ria­ge coven­ant. (cf. Malachi 2:16). John Ort­berg: «A mar­ria­ge vow is such a moving, won­derful, frigh­tening sen­tence becau­se we are deal­ing with a lifel­ong pro­mi­se. We are deal­ing with a coven­ant. A silent echo of God’s vow of his never-ending love for us.»

Some­ti­mes spou­ses who­se mar­ria­ge beca­me com­pli­ca­ted say: God did­n’t put us tog­e­ther at all, it was our own doing. But the point is that mar­ria­ge its­elf is sacred and insti­tu­ted by God. From the moment Sil­via and I said yes to each other, we knew it was over, becau­se God had joi­n­ed us tog­e­ther. Now the­re is no way back. Divorce is not an opti­on. Any pro­blems that ari­se now must be resol­ved or they will spoil our tog­e­ther­ness. No won­der the disci­ples said to Jesus: «Then it would be bet­ter not to get mar­ried at all!»(Matthew 19:10 NLB).

The roman­tic idea that mar­ria­ge must always be fun, always hap­py, young and beau­tiful comes from Hol­ly­wood, but does not cor­re­spond to rea­li­ty. Mar­ria­ge is some­ti­mes also a rocky road. If we want to last, we have to for­gi­ve again and again, be hum­ble, give in, com­pro­mi­se. Some cou­ples don’t know for sure until they walk down the ais­le whe­ther it is the God-given part­ner. Yes, I do! It is a decis­i­on to grow old tog­e­ther with God’s help. Even if the initi­al fee­lings of hap­pi­ness fade, one must know: My cur­rent marital hap­pi­ness is not as important as the long-term deve­lo­p­ment of my cha­rac­ter through my mar­ria­ge.

Divorce

The fact that Jesus talks about divorce makes it clear that he also expects it. It exis­ted among the peo­p­le of Isra­el, it will also exist among Chris­ti­ans. The Torah says: «Sup­po­se a man mar­ries a woman. Later he no lon­ger likes her becau­se he finds some­thing objec­tionable about her. He wri­tes her a let­ter of divorce, gives it to her and sends her away.» (Deut. 24:1 NLB). The reason for divorce: Becau­se he finds some­thing offen­si­ve about her. The­re are two dif­fe­rent inter­pre­ta­ti­ons in Jewish tradition:

  • The School Scham­mais says: It is exclu­si­ve­ly about for­ni­ca­ti­on and who­re­dom or when the man finds out on the wed­ding night that she is no lon­ger a virgin.
  • The School Hil­lels on the other hand, says: Some­thing offen­si­ve is also when a woman burns a dish or com­mits the crime of gro­wing old.

The ques­ti­on of the Pha­ri­sees in Matthew 19:3 aims at the­se two inter­pre­ta­ti­ons. They wan­ted to know whe­ther Jesus belon­ged to the more libe­ral or more con­ser­va­ti­ve school. Jesus does not ans­wer this ques­ti­on, but shows what mar­ria­ge means. That mar­ria­ge is a sacred coven­ant and that sex seals that coven­ant.

Jesus men­ti­ons a sin­gle clau­se that entit­les a man to divorce his wife: «Unless for for­ni­ca­ti­on» (Matthew 5:32 and 19:9 LUT). The Greek text says por­neia. That this con­cept can­not be equa­ted with adul­tery is shown by the fact that Jesus says: «From the heart come evil thoughts such as mur­der, adul­tery, for­ni­ca­ti­on […].»(Matthew 15:19 NLB). Adul­tery was more than a reason for divorce in the Juda­ism of that time, adul­ter­es­ses were stoned to death. What does por­neia? In the over­all con­text of the New Tes­ta­ment, three mea­nings are found: A dis­so­lu­te life­style in gene­ral, ido­la­try (chea­ting in the spi­ri­tu­al sen­se) and sex out­side marriage.

Divorce is not com­pul­so­ry in cases of spi­ri­tu­al or sexu­al adul­tery. If the spou­se cheats, it is tra­gic, but not hope­l­ess. The­re is for­gi­ve­ness and res­to­ra­ti­on of a rela­ti­onship, but it is a long road. If you have bro­ken out of the mar­ria­ge, you can­not expect the other per­son to sim­ply for­gi­ve you and love you again. Recon­ci­lia­ti­on only has a chan­ce with com­ple­te under­stan­ding and radi­cal brea­king off of an extra­neous rela­ti­onship. For­gi­ve­ness is not a door­mat on which you clean your shoes and then step back into the dirt. For child­ren, it is a huge break-up when a parent cheats. Any­way: If you want to be a good parent, take more care of your spou­se than your child. Do you want to show your love to your child? Love your spou­se! When child­ren see dad­dy and mom­my stan­ding tog­e­ther, it gives them secu­ri­ty and con­fi­dence, which are the best addi­ti­ons on the way to healt­hy personalities.

So in the Old Tes­ta­ment the­re was no con­nec­tion bet­ween adul­tery and divorce. What then made divorce legi­ti­ma­te? We do not know. Jesus says: «Moses allo­wed divorce becau­se your hearts are hard, but ori­gi­nal­ly it was not God’s will»(Matthew 19:8 NLB). In a mar­ria­ge, an indis­so­lu­b­le lifel­ong coven­ant and some­ti­mes hard hearts face each other. Unfort­u­na­te­ly, they are some­ti­mes so hard that divorce is the bet­ter way. Hard hearts show them­sel­ves in an unwil­ling­ness to give in or for­gi­ve. A hard heart can be so bru­tal. Not only phy­si­cal­ly. Some­ti­mes the emo­tio­nal and psy­cho­lo­gi­cal strang­ling of the other is even worse. Divorce is an emer­gen­cy order of God, a dis­tor­ti­on of the coven­ant. It is meant to pro­tect the dis­or­de­red life from even grea­ter evil.

Divorce letter

Jesus refers to the insti­tu­ti­on of the let­ter of divorce in this pas­sa­ge. This let­ter was not a free let­ter, but a let­ter of pro­tec­tion. It had a pro­phyl­ac­tic and a caring component.

The divorce let­ter pre­ven­ted a man from dis­miss­ing his wife light­ly and arbi­tra­ri­ly. In a pro­per court hea­ring, the case was dis­cus­sed and the reasons scru­ti­ni­sed. Jesus tea­ches us a divorce poli­cy that is more rest­ric­ti­ve than the libe­ral posi­ti­on of Rab­bi Hil­lel, which was influ­en­ti­al in Juda­ism at the time. All the more he chal­lenges us to invest a lot in mar­ria­ge and to fight for it. One cou­ple, on their Iron Wed­ding Anni­ver­sa­ry, when asked how they had made it so long tog­e­ther, repli­ed: «We were born into a time when peo­p­le fixed bro­ken things ins­tead of thro­wing them away.«Again and again I hear from mar­ried cou­ples who have gone through serious cri­ses, but have found their way back with exter­nal help. This should not hap­pen only when the dice for ending the mar­ria­ge have alre­a­dy been cast deep in the heart. As see­tal chi­le we want to offer help through cour­ses and per­so­nal accom­p­animent. And – very important: We want to sup­port you in get­ting to know Jesus bet­ter. Only He can teach you to love.

Howe­ver, the divorce let­ter also ser­ved to pro­tect the divorced woman, that she was not con­side­red fair game. God is always on the side of the weak and negle­c­ted, the­r­e­fo­re the hus­band was obli­ged to con­ti­nue to sup­port the wife even after the divorce. It is a very gre­at con­cern of mine that espe­ci­al­ly peo­p­le in or after divorce also expe­ri­ence digni­ty and app­re­cia­ti­on in the see­tal chi­le. Dear divorced peo­p­le: You are not fai­led peo­p­le just becau­se your mar­ria­ge fai­led. Even if mar­ria­ges and fami­lies can­not sim­ply be res­to­red, you can expe­ri­ence for­gi­ve­ness and heal­ing. For­gi­ve­ness always includes the pos­si­bi­li­ty of a new beginning.

An inte­res­t­ing obser­va­ti­on is found in Jere­mi­ah 3:8. Alt­hough God wants a lifel­ong mar­ria­ge rela­ti­onship, he issues Isra­el a cer­ti­fi­ca­te of divorce for adul­tery and sends them away. Jesus also assu­mes that divorce exists, other­wi­se he would not talk about it. It is always to be unders­tood as an emer­gen­cy order and not as God’s ori­gi­nal intention.

What about remar­ria­ge then? «But I say unto you, that whos­oe­ver shall put away his wife, except for for­ni­ca­ti­on, and mar­ry ano­ther, com­mit­teth adul­tery; and whos­oe­ver mar­rieth a woman put away com­mit­teth adul­tery.»(Matthew 19:9 ELB). This pas­sa­ge says that whoe­ver divorces wit­hout jus­ti­fi­ca­ti­on is actual­ly still mar­ried to the for­mer part­ner. In such a case, remar­ria­ge is adul­tery, but not becau­se the mar­ria­ge would be indis­so­lu­b­le, but becau­se one is actual­ly still mar­ried. God’s grace and for­gi­ve­ness is abo­ve bro­ken rela­ti­onships. The­re is for­gi­ve­ness even for peo­p­le who­se mar­ria­ge has fai­led. Losing a rela­ti­onship is pain­ful. But even worse: losing yours­elf becau­se of a relationship.

«Mar­ria­ge: an absurd inven­ti­on that can only exist through the infi­ni­te grace of God»(Gabri­el Gar­cia Mar­quez). Why does Jesus tigh­ten the screw on divorce and remar­ria­ge com­pared to Moses? Becau­se he helps us. He is the faithful one. Through his help and grace, his faithful­ness can beco­me our vir­tue. All evil, inclu­ding for­ni­ca­ti­on and adul­tery, comes from the heart. David pray­ed: «God, crea­te in me a pure heart and give me a new, sin­ce­re spi­rit»(Psalm 51:12 NLB). Through meta­mor­pho­sis, the hard heart is chan­ged into a new heart. This opens up com­ple­te­ly new pos­si­bi­li­ties and a new respon­si­bi­li­ty. Let Jesus chan­ge you and dance to his music!

 

 

Possible questions for the small groups

Read Bible text: Matthew 5:31–32; 19:3–10

  1. Why does mar­ria­ge have such a high value in God’s eyes and is indissoluble?
  2. What does this mean for God’s love for us humans?
  3. What grounds legi­ti­mi­se divorce?
  4. What is the pro­blem of remarriage?
  5. How could we streng­then mar­ria­ges in the con­text of see­tal chile?