The name of God on the thorn bush

Date: 26 Febru­ary 2023 | Pre­a­cher:
Series: | Bible text: Exodus 3:7–14
Hint: This ser­mon has been machi­ne trans­la­ted. Plea­se note that we can­not accept any respon­si­bi­li­ty for the accu­ra­cy of the content.

Moses» encoun­ter with the holy God at the thorn bush com­ple­te­ly tur­ned his life around. As the basis for his maxi­mal­ly chal­len­ging mis­si­on – to lead a peo­p­le of mil­li­ons out of cap­ti­vi­ty into an unknown land – the LORD intro­du­ces hims­elf by name. «I am who I will turn out to be.«The holy God is not com­pre­hen­si­ble for us humans, but HE is also not arbi­tra­ry. His holi­ne­ss gua­ran­teed purest good­ness, mer­cy, love and empathy.


The qua­li­ty of a Chris­ti­an grou­ping depends pri­ma­ri­ly on how serious­ly they take the holy God. We want to beco­me a church that mar­vels at God’s majes­ty, beau­ty and unavai­la­bi­li­ty and does not degra­de Him to an avun­cu­lar über-good-man. From the bur­ning bush it sound­ed: «Mose, Mose!» (Exodus 3:4). The holy God knew the name of Moses befo­re Moses knew the name of God. But the ques­ti­on fol­lows: «If I go to the Israe­li­tes and tell them, «The God of your ances­tors has sent me to you,» and then they ask me, «What is his name?» what shall I ans­wer them?» (Exodus 3:13 NLB). In the Jewish con­text, the name has even grea­ter signi­fi­can­ce than in ours. It is the pro­gram­me that belongs to a per­son. The­r­e­fo­re it is under­stan­da­ble that Moses wants to know the name of his employer.

New name

«God repli­ed: «I am who I always am. Just tell them: «I am» has sent me to you.»(Exodus 3:14 NLB). Luther trans­la­tes: «I will be who I will be.«In the Hebrew Bible, the let­ters J‑H-W‑H stand for the name of God (6828 times in the Tanakh).. So the holy God does not pre­sent hims­elf with a «Nameword», but with the «Tunword» its befo­re. One could also trans­la­te: I am who I will turn out to be. The­re is no name that could cap­tu­re the great­ness and majes­ty of God. A noun would be far too sta­tic, too self-contained.

Later, God will give Moses two tablets with God’s ins­truc­tions. One of them says that man should not make an image of God (cf. Ex 20:4). Every image we make of God falls short and cuts Him down in His uni­ma­gi­nable great­ness. No image – neither men­tal nor mate­ri­al – can even come clo­se to gras­ping God. It is part of God’s holi­ne­ss that He remains unavailable to us. We don’t have a grip on Him. He is not a mas­cot that we can put in our pocket. For the Jews, the name of God YHWH is so sacred that they never use it. That’s why later, when the Hebrew Bible was voca­li­sed, they did­n’t even know how to pro­no­un­ce the name. That is why the­re are churches that Jeho­vah say, others pre­fer Yah­weh.

Does the name of God (I am who I will turn out to be) that Yah­weh is capri­cious, unpre­dic­ta­ble and arbi­tra­ry? Capri­cious and arbi­tra­ry – no. Unpre­dic­ta­ble – yes! Yah­weh is holy, so pure, full of love, mer­cy and good­ness that we can never cal­cu­la­te this. God is abso­lut­e­ly pure and beau­tiful, in Him the­re are no shadows, the­r­e­fo­re we can only be posi­tively sur­pri­sed by His unpre­dic­ta­bi­li­ty. Befo­re Yah­weh gives His name, He says to Moses: «I have seen my peo­p­le oppres­sed in Egypt. And I have heard their cries. I know how much they are suf­fe­ring. I have come to res­cue them from the power of the Egyp­ti­ans and to lead them out of Egypt into a beau­tiful, vast land, a land flowing with milk and honey […] I have heard the cry of the Israe­li­tes and I have seen how they are oppres­sed by the Egyp­ti­ans»(Exodus 3:7–9 NLB). Last Sun­day, a woman told me that God must have for­got­ten her. Pro­ba­b­ly the peo­p­le of Isra­el felt the same way during their 400 years of cap­ti­vi­ty. Yah­weh has seen, heard, He knows about the need, the suf­fe­ring and has come.

Yah­weh has such a pure and excel­lent cha­rac­ter pre­cis­e­ly on the ground of His holi­ne­ss that His name can only arou­se posi­ti­ve expectations.

New fear of God

Man’s ade­qua­te respon­se to God’s holi­ne­ss is awe, respect and wor­ship. The Jews wear a kip­pah out of rever­ence for God so that they do not come into direct cont­act with God’s holi­ne­ss. Moses took off his shoes and kept his distance from the bur­ning bush.

This week peo­p­le have asked me about the rela­ti­onship bet­ween distance and clo­sen­ess to God. Are we sup­po­sed to love or fear Yah­weh? Yah­weh demands both at the same time: «Now, O Isra­el, what more doth the LORD thy God requi­re of thee, but that thou shoul­dest prai­se the LORD thy God? fearthat you will walk in all his ways and love him And ser­ve the LORD thy God with all thi­ne heart, and with all thy soul, to keep the com­mandments of the LORD, and his sta­tu­tes, which I com­mand thee this day, that it may go well with thee?»(Deut 10:12f LUT). Tho­se who fear God express that they are ama­zed at God’s beau­ty, majes­ty and holi­ne­ss. Yah­weh is the Crea­tor, I am a crea­tu­re, He is the LORD, I am His ser­vant. From this atti­tu­de of won­der and humi­li­ty, love gets on the right track and pre­pa­res the way for ser­vice and obe­dience. Fear of God and love do not con­tra­dict each other.

Respect, rever­ence and taking God serious­ly is the basis for fri­end­ship. David wri­tes: «Fri­end­ship with the Lord is due to tho­se who take Him serious­ly (fear Him).»(Psalm 25:14 NGÜ). What we can­not put tog­e­ther in our world of expe­ri­ence belongs tog­e­ther with God. Moses expe­ri­en­ced the holi­ne­ss of God seve­ral times, which fos­te­red his fear of God and made fri­end­ship with Yah­weh pos­si­ble in the first place: «The LORD spo­ke to Moses face to face, as one who speaks to his fri­end […].» (Exodus 33:11 NLB). God’s holi­ne­ss and fri­end­ship with God is not a con­tra­dic­tion.

When Jesus pray­ed for his fol­lo­wers befo­re his death, he said: «[…] Holy Father, keep them in your name which you have given me, that they may be one as we are one»(John 17:11 NLB). He thus brings tog­e­ther the father­hood of God and his holi­ne­ss. That is why I like the sen­tence: I talk to my loving Father and fall silent befo­re the holy God. The addres­see is the same. For us it may seem ambi­va­lent, but with God, father­hood grows out of His holi­ne­ss. That which is born out of holi­ne­ss is abso­lut­e­ly pure and good.

New chapter in life

Moses recei­ved a com­mis­si­on from Yah­weh that – human­ly spea­king – sim­ply frigh­ten­ed him. The life-threa­tening cal­ling is: «Now go, for I am sen­ding you to Pha­raoh. You shall lead my peo­p­le, the Israe­li­tes, out of Egypt.»(Exodus 3:10 NLB).

Four cha­rac­te­ristics stand out that Moses did not have befo­re the encoun­ter with God’s holiness:

  • Moses was fearlessLet us not for­get that Moses fled Egypt becau­se he feared for his life. And now he is sup­po­sed to lead a peo­p­le of mil­li­ons out of cap­ti­vi­ty. A quo­te from Arno Back­haus reve­als the secret: «The more fear of God, the less fear of pagansThe best reci­pe against the fears in our ever­y­day life – be it of situa­tions or of peo­p­le – is the fear of the Lord. He who can kne­el befo­re God can stand befo­re men. «Moses left the land of Egypt through faith. He was not afraid of the king, but went on stead­fast­ly becau­se he fixed his gaze on the One who is invi­si­ble»(Hebrews 11:27 NLB).
  • Moses was obe­dientFrom Moses we can also learn to keep God’s word even when we do not under­stand it. Jesus repea­ted­ly draws atten­ti­on to the con­nec­tion bet­ween loving God and kee­ping His com­mandments (e.g. John 14:21). A love that does not take God’s holi­ne­ss serious­ly is in dan­ger of revol­ving around its­elf after all.
  • Moses did not seek his own com­fortTho­se who take God serious­ly take His Word serious­ly, even if the imple­men­ta­ti­on is uncom­for­ta­ble. After the thorn bush, Moses first asked: What does God want? And not: What is most com­for­ta­ble for me? From the per­spec­ti­ve of the aut­hor of the Let­ter to the Hebrews, it sounds like this: «By faith, Moses, when he was an adult, refu­sed to be cal­led the son of Pharaoh’s daugh­ter. He pre­fer­red to suf­fer with the peo­p­le rather than indul­ge in the flee­ting plea­su­res of sin» (Hebrews 11:24f NLB). Moses could have arran­ged his life com­for­ta­b­ly. At Pharaoh’s court, a life of luxu­ry and at the cent­re of world poli­tics beckon­ed. Later, after his escape from Egypt, he mar­ried Zip­po­rah in Midi­an. Now a tran­quil life as a young fami­ly was within reach with child­ren who could grow up in a safe envi­ron­ment. But Moses was rea­dy to give up his own com­fort. Jesus also chal­lenges us to take up the cross and fol­low Him. The con­di­ti­on for this is the encoun­ter with the holi­ne­ss of God.
  • Moses was hum­ble: The encoun­ter with God at the thorn bush rai­sed Moses» life to a pre­vious­ly unknown level. From now on, he was no lon­ger ten­ding his father-in-law’s sheep, but lea­ding a nati­on of mil­li­ons into a com­ple­te­ly unknown, still occu­p­ied land. The­re could hard­ly be a more deman­ding task. Despi­te the huge respon­si­bi­li­ty and wit­nessing many mira­cles, Moses remain­ed hum­ble. «Moses was very hum­ble, the­re was no one on earth more hum­ble than him» (Exodus 12:13 NLB). He who fears God remains simp­le and mode­st – even in the grea­test suc­cess.

 

Loo­king at Moses» life around the thorn bush expe­ri­ence trig­gers a new lon­ging in me. Could it be that dis­co­ve­ring and expe­ri­en­cing God’s holi­ne­ss more deep­ly could satis­fy my hun­ger for more of God? One thing is cer­tain: the more we under­stand about God’s holi­ne­ss, the more valuable the redemp­ti­ve act of Jesus Christ beco­mes to us. He has fil­led up the gap bet­ween us and Yah­weh. What He has not fil­led up, howe­ver, is the holi­ne­ss of God. Thanks to Jesus, we may con­fi­dent­ly come befo­re the thro­ne of our gra­cious God. Let us do so and mar­vel at the beau­ty, majes­ty and pure love in which He is plea­sed to show Hims­elf in your life too!

 

Possible questions for the small group 

Rea­ding the Bible text: Exodus 3:7–14

  1. What does it take for deal­ing with the mys­tery of God’s holi­ne­ss to beco­me a qua­li­ty fea­ture of see­tal chile?
  2. Why does the Lord intro­du­ce Hims­elf not with a noun but with a verb? What does this have to do with the fact that we are not sup­po­sed to form an image of God?
  3. The Lord will pro­ve Hims­elf. What gives us the cer­tain­ty that He does not act arbitrarily?
  4. Whe­re is the con­nec­tion bet­ween Moses» fear of God and his cou­ra­ge to accept the com­mis­si­on and the humi­li­ty in which he lives it?
  5. What has chan­ged in the con­text of God’s holi­ne­ss through Jesus Christ? What has remain­ed the same?